Placing the Chavez item on the consent calendar - where the city council often votes on several items, such as contracts or appointments, in a single vote - instead of the regular agenda was one problem, the lawsuit alleges. The plaintiffs are requesting a judge place a block on the renaming, even though it has started. The lawsuit alleges 12 different areas of fault with the renaming process, mostly based on loss of due process. (GV Wire/David Taub) Lawsuit: Due Process, Among Other Rights Violated Lewis calls for the Fresno City Council to reverse its Cesar Chavez Boulevard vote at an April 2023 news conference at City Hall. “It would be irresponsible for me to comment on a matter related to pending litigation, we have a due process and I look forward to the facts being presented and evaluated by a court and subsequent ruling,” Chavez said. Lewis, a renaming opponent, told GV Wire.Ĭity Attorney Andrew Janz said the city doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.įresno City Councilman Miguel Arias - a co-sponsor of the bill - mentioned the lawsuit in a tweet, calling it a “new frivolous lawsuit by anti-Latino and GOP operatives.”Įven though there is no gag order, neither co-sponsors of the renaming, Luis Chavez (no relation to Cesar Chavez) and Nelson Esparza, wanted to comment, citing the ongoing court case. And I think that they railroaded this decision without consideration for community engagement,” Pastor B.T. “I think the city council’s decision to move forward with this renaming it is unreasonable and unfair to our community at large. The opposition group alleges that the renaming was improperly noticed, and violated state environmental laws and free speech rights.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |